Replay
The Sound Kitchen
Party-On Pakistan !
 
Listen Download Podcast
  • RFI English News flash 04h00 - 04h10 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 04h00 GMT
  • Paris Live AM 04h10 - 04h30 GMT Mon-Fri
    Features and analysis 03/29 04h10 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 05h00 - 05h10 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 05h00 GMT
  • Paris Live AM 05h10 - 05h30 GMT Mon-Fri
    Features and analysis 03/29 05h10 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 06h00 - 06h10 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 06h00 GMT
  • Paris Live AM 06h10 - 06h30 GMT Mon-Fri
    Features and analysis 03/29 06h10 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 06h30 - 06h33 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 06h30 GMT
  • Paris Live AM 06h33 - 06h59 GMT Mon-Fri
    Features and analysis 03/29 06h33 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 07h00 - 07h10 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 07h00 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 07h30 - 07h33 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 07h30 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 14h00 - 14h03 GMT Sat-Sun
    News bulletin 03/26 14h00 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 14h00 - 14h06 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 14h00 GMT
  • Paris Live Weekend 14h03 - 14h30 GMT Sat-Sun
    Features and analysis 03/26 14h03 GMT
  • Paris Live PM 14h06 - 14h30 GMT Mon-Fri
    Features and analysis 03/29 14h06 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 14h30 - 14h33 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/29 14h30 GMT
  • Paris Live PM 14h33 - 14h59 GMT Mon-Fri
    Features and analysis 03/29 14h33 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 16h00 - 16h03 GMT Sat-Sun
    News bulletin 03/26 16h00 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 16h00 - 16h06 GMT Sat-Sun
    News bulletin 03/28 16h00 GMT
  • Paris Live Weekend 16h03 - 16h30 GMT Sat-Sun
    Features and analysis 03/26 16h03 GMT
  • RFI English News flash 16h30 - 16h33 GMT Mon-Fri
    News bulletin 03/28 16h30 GMT
  • Paris Live Weekend 16h33 - 17h00 GMT Sat-Sun
    Features and analysis 03/26 16h33 GMT
To take full advantage of multimedia content, you must have the Flash plugin installed in your browser. To connect, you need to enable cookies in your browser settings. For an optimal navigation, the RFI site is compatible with the following browsers: Internet Explorer 8 and above, Firefox 10 and +, Safari 3+, Chrome 17 and + etc.
Environment

German government ordered to pay damages for nuclear phase-out

media Demonstrators cross the Rhine into France to demonstrate against the Fessenheim nuclear reactor in 2011 Christian Hartmann/Reuters

Germany’s constitutional court on Tuesday ordered the government to compensate energy companies for losses incurred because of its phasing out of nuclear power. While the decision could lead other governments to slow their transitions to renewable energy, green campaigners say the decision is actually a positive development.

The Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan in 2011 prompted Germany’s government to make abrupt changes to its energy policy.

It had committed to using nuclear power until at least 2036 but the Fukushima accident inspired it to shut down eight reactors immediately and phase out the nine others by the end of 2022.

The move prompted German power giants EON and RWE, as well as Swedish company Vattenfall, to take legal action over what they called an “expropriation” of their assets.

The Karlsruhe court gave the policy shift its clear endorsement.

“It was permissible for lawmakers to take the accident in Fukushima as a prompt to speed up exiting nuclear energy to protect the health of people and the environment,” said senior judge Ferdinand Kirchhof.

Amount of compensation unclear

What is less clear from the ruling was the nature of the compensation to be provided to the companies.

The court ruled that “appropriate” compensation was in order, given that the government did not recompense for planned investments or guarantee how much power the plants could still generate, but it did not define any amounts or any criteria for what it felt appropriate compensation was.

Instead, it gave the government and the plaintiffs a June 2018 deadline to reach a settlement and writing it into the phase-out law.

“It will be left to out-of-court settlement, probably negotiations around the exact amount of the compensation,” says Catherine Banet, associate professor of energy law at the University of Oslo.

“The criteria will be interesting to follow in terms of a precedent, and then, in any case, the parliament has to amend the legislation by June 2018, so that will be the other direct consequence of the decision.”

Anti-nuclear campaigners hailed the decision and said the court rejected so many of the companies’ arguments that the ruling could only be considered a positive development for the phase-out of nuclear energy.

“The compensation that companies expected, something like 20 billion euros, is not on the table anymore,” says nuclear physicist Heinz Smital, who took part in proceedings on behalf of Greenpeace Germany.

“There’s only a small correction for Vattenfall and RWE,” he argues. “It’s just electricity production rights that have to be more clear and detailed, so just making a clear regulation on how this transfer is done would cut the main compensation RWE and Vattenfall is expecting. So it’s very clearly in favour of a vast nuclear phase-out in general.”

A precedent for energy transition?

The ruling raises the question of repercussions in countries in regions where governments are also changing their energy policies.

“The decision was taken quite quickly after Fukushima to close the plants, and perhaps all the ramifications weren’t thought through fully at that time,” says Stephen Thomas, professor of energy policy at the University of Greenwich, making the point the accelerated phase-out in Germany was a particularly ambitious example.

“Where we have phase-outs, then there will have to be negotiations with companies to make sure they are happy with the arrangements,” he adds. “For example in Britain, where we’re planning to build a plant, there is an explicit clause that says compensation will be paid if the plant is closed early, for political reasons.”

Banet agrees that governments will likely see the ruling as a precedent to make sure they do not get into similar situations with investors.

“My guess is that we will be more careful in the speed of the energy transition, and we have different examples of that,” she says.

“You have the winter energy package presented by the European Commission, which is reflecting all those concerns: speeding up or not speeding up energy transition, protecting investments made, ensuring security of energy supply but continuing support of renewables. And we have had a case in Spain and other cases pending, where there have been some retroactive changes made to support schemes, and foreign and national investors complaining about that.”

Related
 
Sorry but the period of time connection to the operation is exceeded.